BrilhasMuito
Well-Known Member
Olha, para ti eu respondo já, rapidinho, rapidinho:
Eu só emiti a minha opinião que, para qualquer vulgar indivíduo que saiba ler, perceberá que não enxovalhei ninguém, muito menos o user a quem eu respondi. De facto, até tenho mais que 10 anos de fotografia(que não é nada na realidade mas apenas para se perceber que já vi e fiz muitas fotos e sei perfeitamente emitir uma opinião sobre tal matéria) e já participei em muitos fóruns, aprendi com os melhores na área do amadorismo e alguns profissionais. E estas fotos não valem mesmo muito. Ora, com isto, não estou a dizer que é culpa do user do spark. Se leres bem ou se souberes ler, irás constatar que as fotos estão tal e qual como eu referi e até pedi desculpa ao user por emitir aquela opinião que é só minha e ninguém tem nada com isso. Se há virgens ofendidas aqui, paciência, não é a minha praia. A minha praia é fotografia e o aperfeiçoamento constante da mesma. Por outro lado, se ainda conseguires ler, facilmente te apercebes que estou a emitir uma opinião do spark e sobre as suas capacidades de fotografar. O user, pelo que vejo, pouco percebe de fotografia e acha até que as fotos estão bem...Pesquisa no 500px.com ou no flickr sobre fotos feitas com o Spark e depois compara com estas... E, posto isto, refiro na última frase que o spark não é muito bom para fotografia nocturna, aliás, pesquisando facilmente na net por reviews, youtube e afins, não há um consenso sobre boa fotografia nocturna do spark. E foi isto que eu quis dizer. Nunca, ofender o user. Mas, hey...às vezes é preciso saber ouvir criticas negativas ou então andaremos sempre no marasmo habitual do tipo "ah e tal...que excelentes fotos - gosto!".
Não é, definitivamente, o meu modo de estar.
Portanto, quem não gostar, paciência.
Por último, até ia comentar e dar umas dicas sobre o que eu acho que ele deveria fazer, até porque o spark não tem muitas opções para a fotografia como o Mavic, por exemplo. O Spark filma a FHD 1920×1080 30p, ponto. O Mavic são vários formatos...
E o sensor de 1/2.3 não é grande espingarda. No entanto, com edição, consegue-se fazer duma foto diurna e algumas semi-nocturnas, umas boas fotos, daí eu ter mencionado o 500px.com ou o flickr e outros por aí...
For those that can't read portuguese...
Look, for you, I'll answer like this:
I only gave my opinion that, for any vulgar individual who can read, you will realize that I did not mess up anyone, much less the user I responded to. In fact, I even have more than 10 years of photography (which is nothing in reality but only to realize that I have seen and made many photos and I know how to express an opinion on this subject) and I have participated in many forums, I have learned with the best in the area of amateurism and some professionals. And these pictures are not worth much either. Well, with that, I'm not saying it's the spark user's fault. If you read well or if you know how to read, you will see that the photos are just like I mentioned and I even apologized to the user for issuing that opinion that is mine and nobody has anything to do with it. If there are offended virgins here, I don't care, it's not my area. My area is photography and the constant improvement of it. On the other hand, if you can still read, you easily realize that I'm giving an opinion of the spark and its shooting abilities. The user, from what I see, little realizes of photography and thinks the photos are ok ... Just look in 500px.com or flickr on photos made with Spark and then compare with these ... And, also, I mean in the last sentence that the spark is not very good for night photography, in fact, searching easily on the net for reviews, youtube and others, there is no consensus on good spark night photography. And that's what I meant. Never, offend the user. But, hey ... sometimes we need to be able to listen to negative reviews or we'll always be in the usual "ah ... what a great pic - like!"
It's definitely not my way...
Therefore, who does not like my opinion I don't care.
Finally, I would comment and give some tips on what I think he should do, because spark does not have many options for photography like Mavic, for example. The Spark films the FHD 1920 × 1080 30p, period. The Mavic are various formats ...
And the 1 / 2.3 sensor is not a great one. However, with editing, it is possible to make a daytime photo and some semi-nocturnal, good photos, hence I mentioned 500px.com or flickr and others out there ...
But in the meantime, some retarded decided to comment on my opinion so I stopped posting here.
Search: DJI spark | Flickr
DJI Spark photos / 500px
Come on, the way you write completely lacks humbleness. Nobody cares where or how you’ve learned photography. Or for how long you work with it. That’s not an interview.
If you really have some knowledge, as you make sure to shout to everyone that you are a pro, please pass some of this knowledge to us in a humble way. Would be a pleasure to learn more from any of you.
You are not the only smart guy in here. Everybody knows the spark is not good for night photos. Everybody sees those pics are not professional. You don’t need to highlight none of that just to show off your abilities.
You also made sure to write in Portuguese in an English/American forum not to help me understand but to show off.
As you said in a pretty arrogant way that I’m a “virgin” in photography. Yes! I’m humble enough to agree with you. But as I said before I’m here to learn and there is no shame in that.
There are many ways to express an opinion and your way was definitely arrogant and so far your opinion hasn’t improved anyone’s knowledge. Just your ego.
But relax man. Nobody cares!
Have a nice weekend!
Fly safe!
Last edited: