let me dig the file up. I did not put the data field in for watts and I did not check but was not getting any feed for the Amps.Where can I find that overlay?
That is awesome!
let me dig the file up. I did not put the data field in for watts and I did not check but was not getting any feed for the Amps.
Good distance. I'll have to try for a good distance. In this video I did not go over 200 ft high and i was seating on my tailgate. I'm pretty sure i can get 12k out of it. Where i fly is flat for 3 miles. Before you run into some building. I've done some long runs with the phantom's here.Just went through my files and had a little fun...
"Borrow" a NOTAM?How about vertical distance - with permission from an authority to "borrow" their NOTAM.
Details in the YouTube description
"Borrow" a NOTAM?
Quite true! The NOTAM was issued by the FAA for the model aircraft/rocketry, not for your drone. These actions could very well place the club in jeopardy of ever receiving permission again. If the Systems GO! Director is not permitted to approve FAA waivers, then the flight was in absolute violation of the FAA rules. My recommendation would be to immediately remove any and all video of the flight and NOT advertise the violation, if this was completed without an FAA approved waiver! Just a suggestion! Reminder also, if you were flying on behalf of the club, you were flying under Part 107. If you are 107, you should know of the FAA restrictions.What did the FAA say about it? Whether DJI accepts it or not is really irrelevant (other than to remove the flight restriction). Afaik, your flight would have needed to be within the NOTAM specifics approved by the FAA.
There are FAA inspectors in this and many other groups. I suspect they will already have noted this flight. Not sure why it's shared here since it was done on a Mavic Air apparently.
Quite true! The NOTAM was issued by the FAA for the model aircraft/rocketry, not for your drone. These actions could very well place the club in jeopardy of ever receiving permission again. If the Systems GO! Director is not permitted to approve FAA waivers, then the flight was in absolute violation of the FAA rules. My recommendation would be to immediately remove any and all video of the flight and NOT advertise the violation, if this was completed without an FAA approved waiver! Just a suggestion! Reminder also, if you were flying on behalf of the club, you were flying under Part 107. If you are 107, you should know of the FAA restrictions.
Please DO NOT violate the rules of flight and advertise! Understand, please, the actions were in violation of FAA rules, I think the video was very nice, but the actions were wrong! If the FAA visits your YouTube, you may find yourself on the wrong end. Please do NOT advertise like that!