Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
RID ideas starting to show up
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SPark_South_Oz" data-source="post: 125192" data-attributes="member: 17032"><p>I guess authorities don't want to be buying expensive gear to be able to read regular app hacked signals.</p><p>Aeroscope certainly has had its day, well at least the mobile version is no longer available, the fixed model for airports etc is still there for those places authorities deem necessary.</p><p></p><p>Yes, it seems that US drone pilots are raising mainly general populous ability to know where an (often) expensive drone is being flown, and the pilots location, and with that their concern that it could lead to property theft, possibly with violence.</p><p>Sad to say that this can be considered such an issue / risk . . . blown out of proportion or possibly some urban areas it could be a valid concern.</p><p></p><p>Secondary is so called Karens (or Kens ?) being able to create more confrontational situations.</p><p></p><p>I know that some pilots in the FPV drone game were concerned about remote ID and how it might affect them, but they seem to have settled in with it in a neutral way.</p><p>Many do fly in small groups for spotter requirements, so their concerns with theft risk is probably less of a worry.</p><p>There'd be a lot flying outside the legal requirements too I'm sure.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, time will tell if such concerns are valid, and I am pretty sure that watching the US will be a good reflection of what will likely come to other countrys soon enough, the UK, EU, Australia, New Zealand, will likely all follow eventually.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SPark_South_Oz, post: 125192, member: 17032"] I guess authorities don't want to be buying expensive gear to be able to read regular app hacked signals. Aeroscope certainly has had its day, well at least the mobile version is no longer available, the fixed model for airports etc is still there for those places authorities deem necessary. Yes, it seems that US drone pilots are raising mainly general populous ability to know where an (often) expensive drone is being flown, and the pilots location, and with that their concern that it could lead to property theft, possibly with violence. Sad to say that this can be considered such an issue / risk . . . blown out of proportion or possibly some urban areas it could be a valid concern. Secondary is so called Karens (or Kens ?) being able to create more confrontational situations. I know that some pilots in the FPV drone game were concerned about remote ID and how it might affect them, but they seem to have settled in with it in a neutral way. Many do fly in small groups for spotter requirements, so their concerns with theft risk is probably less of a worry. There'd be a lot flying outside the legal requirements too I'm sure. Anyway, time will tell if such concerns are valid, and I am pretty sure that watching the US will be a good reflection of what will likely come to other countrys soon enough, the UK, EU, Australia, New Zealand, will likely all follow eventually. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
RID ideas starting to show up